
Water services
Solutions for the water sector including quality monitoring, modelling, infrastructure design, engineering and asset management.
No Content Set
Exception:
Website.Models.ViewModels.Components.General.Banners.BannerComponentVm
The complexities and challenges of high-level solution development for overflow spill reductions.
The 2024 Price Review (PR24) defines the projected costs water companies will incur in AMP8 to deliver Ofwat’s expectations for the 5-year period. These expectations are largely driven by customers’ concerns, climate change and water quality, with significant focus on the reduction of storm overflow discharges. RPS worked with UU during PR24 to rapidly develop high-level solutions to reduce overflow spill occurrences at sites discharging frequently.
The solutions evaluated consisted of both grey and blue-green approaches, building storage tanks (grey), and the removal of impermeable areas via Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) (blue-green), as well as hybrid solutions combining both approaches. This process is used as a lens within this article to highlight industry-wide challenges, complexities, and future considerations to ensure realistic solution development.
In this case, grey storage volumes were calculated with the use of model simulations and a tool to determine appropriate storage volumes.
On occasions, headroom within the existing network was significantly limited, posing a critical challenge to the development of a solution as it would not be possible to return attenuated flow back into the system. Without this consideration, modelled tanks could empty more quickly than is possible in reality, and it is likely that undersized and under-priced tanks would be proposed which could fail to meet spill targets once implemented. In these instances, opportunities for SuDS-only or hybrid solutions, which are less reliant on network capacity, should be maximised to avoid headroom limitations. Increasing network and treatment capacity may also be an option to ensure storage is a viable solution.
With additional stored volumes at various sites within the network, there is increased pressure on the treatment of these flows that usually would spill to the environment. If the capacity and operation of the treatment works is not considered, this may essentially result in a shift of spills from the network overflows to the overflows at the treatment works. Ideally, catchment-wide risk and the performance of treatment works should be considered as part of solution development to avoid this issue.
Impermeable area (IA) reduction via SuDS was calculated through the identification of areas which could realistically be removed and where SuDS systems could be viably installed. In this scenario, solutions were modelled, simulated and spill frequencies re-assessed.
Retrofitting SuDS to existing impermeable areas to reduce their contribution to the network can occur on a small scale, i.e. the roofs, drives and curtilages of private property. Whilst these features can positively influence a local environment, they introduce potential issues regarding agreements and access to carry out such work, which many be a lengthy, costly and complex process. The rate of refusal for this work to be carried out on properties should be accounted for to produce blue-green solutions that are more likely to realise the expected benefits.
Confidence in the connectivity of impermeable areas is important in producing the most reliable SuDS solutions, and surveys would have to be carried out in areas of uncertainty. This would require a significant amount of work and take valuable time, adding pressure to delivery of these solutions. Even with confidence in the connected areas, this project found that a very small proportion of solutions tested were able to achieve the overflow reduction target with a SuDS-only scheme. Hybrid solutions utilising both SuDS and traditional storage tanks offered more viable options, however grey-only solutions offered the highest proportion of viable options.
When multiple overflows require solutions, rather than carrying out assessments on a site-by-site basis it may be beneficial to derive solutions on a more systematic catchment-by-catchment approach. The impact of implementing a solution at one overflow is likely to positively impact any downstream overflows, therefore, by considering multiple CSOs within a catchment at one time this is likely to produce an overall more efficient and cost-effective solution. Attenuating flows at an upstream site will reduce peak flows received at any downstream sites and may therefore reduce the storage volume required for a tank, or the amount of area to be removed for a SuDS or hybrid solution. There is a limitation to this approach in that it would not be possible to further develop an individual solution without also developing all hydraulically linked solutions synchronously.
An understanding of the root cause of CSO spills allows the smartest and most appropriate solution to be developed. Simplistically, the root causes largely consist of excess incoming flow, the inability to store or treat excess flow, premature spill mechanisms, or the inability to pass forward sufficient flow. For example, if the root cause is excess incoming flow from Ground Infiltration (GI) then building a tank to attenuate this flow may not be appropriate. An improved solution may be identifying the source of GI and removing or redirecting the flows from this, or if the source cannot be identified then pass-forward capacity of the CSO may be re-evaluated.
In carrying out the rapid high-level solutions development for high spilling overflows, it can be concluded that, ideally, solutions development calls for the collection, acknowledgement and understanding of details such as root causes of spills, contributing areas, hydraulically linked sites, treatment and network capacity, as well as the consideration of other complexities including the difficulties associated with retrofitting SuDS. The challenges associated with obtaining and compiling this data are considerable, however considering these aspects is likely to result in more viable and efficient solutions and an overall saving in terms of programme time and cost.
Water is vital to human life, health, and prosperity. Managing it is one of the most complex issues that faces our world today. We work alongside world-renowned water custodians across the globe, providing technical and commercial expertise to sustainably utilise, manage, and conserve water resources