Yesterday, UK Government published its British energy security strategy. It was a rallying call to create a power supply โthatโs made in Britain, for Britainโ, taking back our energy self-sufficiency and non-reliance on foreign sources.
08 Apr 2022
It looks like a positive step in the right direction. And if each element within the strategy comes to pass, the UKโs energy supply landscape will look very different in the decades to come.
But is it enough? And with the plan already being accused of missing opportunities and being incoherent in its outlined intentions, is the government making the most of all the natural resources available to them?
Andy Clifton, RPS Managing Director โ Environment, discusses the impact of the strategy, and its long-term approach.ย
The UK was already moving towards a net zero target. And so perhaps unsurprisingly the strategy places a heavy reliance on a renewable and low carbon energy supply to help fulfil its goals. The scale of the plan looks bold, but as a long-term plan time will be the judge of whether the ambitious targets are realised.
Russiaโs invasion of Ukraine, coupled with rapidly rising energy costs, has clearly underlined the necessity for UK Government to look at energy security. It wants and arguably needs to insulate the UK from erratic global energy prices and intermittent supplies.
Insulation wasnโt a topic that seemed, or seems, to be on the UK Governmentโs agenda. The strategy instead focuses heavily on how we will generate and transmit energy, rather than go big on the detail in reducing energy consumption, especially in the short-term. That omission inevitably attracted a lot of criticism by green groups. Even the Climate Change Committee (CCC), reacted by stating โit is disappointing not to see more on energy efficiencyโ1.
There also seems to be a lack of ambition around onshore wind energy use, despite it being one of the cheapest renewable energy sources. This strategy doesnโt provide any figures on how much additional onshore wind the government hopes the UK will produce. But as more of an afterthought, โrecognises the range of views on onshore windโ.
This almost goes against data from the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS)2, where only 4% of the public oppose onshore wind, in comparison to 14% that oppose nuclear, which sits as a major part of the strategy.
It doesnโt feel like public opinion has been taken into consideration. Should it have? That may well be another argument in itself. But this lack of consideration is highlighted even more when 44% of the public is opposed to shale gas (โfrackingโ), and yet, the government claims to be โopen-mindedโ about implementing it as an energy source.
The strategy makes several references to potential changes to UK environmental planning regimes. This is to reduce the time it takes to get energy infrastructure consent. To highlight:
All three points above will inevitably raise concerns over inadequate protection to environment and health during construction and operation of new energy schemes.
This direction of travel will bring big change to the UKโs energy supply, with renewable energy rightly at the forefront.
But with big opportunities, come big challenges. The streamlining of planning regimes, the balance to ensure more time-efficient processes, and implementing sustainable infrastructure development, are just a few important concerns that need to be addressed.
The inclusion of Hydrogen and Floating Wind also gives us a view of the future. Presenting such openings to these industries is, in its own right, for the UK to lead in the same way it has for fixed offshore wind.
On top of all that having enough skilled resources to plan, design and construct projects against the backdrop of the already extremely busy renewable sector, and long declining nuclear sector, will be a major hurdle to overcome to meet the governmentโs ambitions.
One central issue however is reducing energy demand. Without serious consideration of how we approach a reduction in our energy demand or fast-tracking renewables, thereโs a question of whether this strategy even addresses what it was designed to achieve.
Technical innovation will play a vital role in the realisation of the strategyโs ambitions. But will the government address the concerns of whatโs been left out of the strategy, rather than whatโs been included? Only time will tell.
Your contact information:
All fields are mandatory *
RPS is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We will only use your personal information to administer your account and to provide the products and services you have requested. We would also like to contact you about our products and services, as well as other content that may be of interest to you.
Your contact information:
All fields are mandatory *
RPS is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We will only use your personal information to administer your account and to provide the products and services you have requested. We would also like to contact you about our products and services, as well as other content that may be of interest to you.