Many sites face development risks associated with minerals; whether the presence of safeguarded mineral infrastructure necessitates design changes, or prior mineral extraction is delaying works. Protected minerals are a material consideration under UK planning policy and the earlier they are addressed, the better.
We sat down with Dr Adrian Green, Principal Hydrogeologist, to discuss what you need to know about mineral assessments to avoid any complications to development.
This should be a question any developer asks themselves when considering a new development. The presence of protected mineral resources or the proximity of safeguarded mineral infrastructure can place a very real constraint on development, so the earlier this issue is considered the better. Although the geology of your site or the activities of your neighbours are beyond our control, we can effectively manage the risks they may pose to your interests.
The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) stipulates the need to maintain ‘a sufficient supply of minerals to provide the infrastructure, buildings, energy and goods that the country needs’. As minerals are a fixed and finite natural resource ‘best use needs to be made of them to secure their long-term conservation’. This is achieved through the mineral planning policies adopted by Local Planning Authorities and Mineral Planning Authorities, as presented in their Mineral and Waste Plans.
Mineral safeguarding is a key mechanism used by Local Planning Authorities and protects valuable resources from unnecessary sterilisation by non-mineral development through the designation of Mineral Safeguarding Areas. Typically, mineral safeguarding areas are based on Mineral Resource Maps produced by the British Geological Survey. The diverse geology of the UK results in a wide variety of protected mineral resources, ranging from hard rock formations (igneous and limestone), to unconsolidated granular aggregates and clay deposits.
MRAs are often semi-quantitative, desk-based assessments that use publicly available sources of information. If it’s expected that a significant extent of viable mineral resource exists on site, further site-specific geological characterisation and economic consideration may be necessary. Typically, we obtain site-specific data as part of onsite intrusive investigations and testing, which can be combined with other geotechnical investigations required for the development in order to make cost savings for the client.
If a proposed development is situated near safeguarded mineral infrastructure, typically within a Mineral Consultation Zone, the mineral planning authorities can request a Mineral Infrastructure Assessment (MIA) under the ‘Agent of Change’ principle (paragraph 187 of the NPPF).
An MIA is a multidisciplinary assessment that determines whether the proposed development is likely to have a significant adverse effect on the current and future operations authorised at the safeguarded infrastructure. Where safeguard mineral infrastructure has the potential to significantly impact the development, the development is considered incompatible and measures to mitigate those effects are required.
Recently, many mineral planning authorities seem to be considering the issue of resource sterilisation and incompatible development more robustly. This has demanded careful evaluation of the viability and practicability of prior mineral extraction in advance of development. Clearly, the need for prior extraction has a potentially serious implication for both the programme and cost of development. The issue of the impact of mineral extraction infrastructure is also more robustly considered during the promotion and consenting of development schemes, potentially influencing scheme design.
Many greenfield sites face development risks associated with minerals; whether the presence of safeguarded mineral infrastructure necessitates design changes, or prior mineral extraction causes delays to construction. Delivered by our team of mineral planners, geologists and hydrogeologists, Mineral Resource Assessments (MRA) help manage these risks while meeting relevant mineral planning policy requirements.
Following a review of mineral planning policy relevant to your site, our MRAs provide a resource assessment that determines the extent of workable resource (volume, area and distribution) and the viability or practicability of mineral extraction. We then screen the outcome of the assessment against planning policy. A wide variety of factors must be considered as part of the MRA, including:
Mineral Infrastructure Assessments are a mechanism that help developers demonstrate that their non-mineral development proposals do not constrain mineral extraction and associated operations of safeguarded infrastructure. The MIA requires a multidisciplinary assessment of possible effects related to the safeguarded infrastructure. Here’s our approach:
Your contact information:
All fields are mandatory *
RPS is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We will only use your personal information to administer your account and to provide the products and services you have requested. We would also like to contact you about our products and services, as well as other content that may be of interest to you.
Your contact information:
All fields are mandatory *
RPS is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We will only use your personal information to administer your account and to provide the products and services you have requested. We would also like to contact you about our products and services, as well as other content that may be of interest to you.