News Archive

EC Publishes RPS Research on Allergenic Chemicals in Textiles

27 March 2013

EC Publishes RPS Research on Allergenic Chemicals in Textiles

 
FreeImages.com/Samuel Alves Rosa

RPS’ recently completed evaluation on the casual links between chemicals used in the manufacture of and remaining on finished textile products and allergic reactions for the European Commission is now published on the EC website.

This study is commissioned by the EC regarding Article 25 (and recital 27) of the Regulation 1007/2011/EU [1] which requires the Commission to assess hazardous substances used in textile products; in particular to carry out a study to evaluate whether there is a causal link between allergic reactions and chemical substances or mixtures used in textile products in order to prepare, where appropriate, legislative proposals in the context of existing EU legislation.

There are several substances with hazardous properties, whose concentration in textile products such as clothing, footwear and domestic textiles is not consistently and widely reported. Substances of concern include carcinogens, mutagens, those containing reproductive or endocrine disruptors, those that can cause allergic reactions through skin contact or inhalation, and those that may be hazardous to the environment.

RPS’ research (focussing specifically on substances that may cause allergic reactions) used available scientific literature, epidemiological information and information obtained via direct consultation with the textile industry and reviewed existing related EC regulations. A lack of current information on the use concentrations of allergenic chemicals in finished textile products in the textile industry and a lack of standard testing method on allergies related to textiles created a barrier to establishing any solid conclusive links.

The study was able to conclude that allergic reactions can be induced by textile dyes, finish resins and some other chemicals such as flame retardants and biocides, and has been successful in informing a three-category priority list of sensitising and irritating substances for the EC to consider setting up risk management measures for under the EC Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures Regulation (CLP), where it is found to be appropriate. The categories are:

1.  Substances with classification of sensitisers included in the classification and labelling (C&L) Inventory and intended to remain on finished textile products.
2.  Substances with harmonised classification of sensitiser which, though not intended to remain, do remain on finished textile products and cause textile allergies (e.g. through impurity or component in formulation).
3.  3. Substances with harmonised classification of irritant and intended to remain on finished textile products.

Resulting from the research, the study proposes that three different types of regulatory and non-regulatory actions are considered:

To provide new consumer information requirements under existing legislation
To combine non-regulatory and further harmonisation of control procedures of the presence of sensitisers against information on labels
Derivation and harmonisation of limit values based on quantative risk assessment methods
Further analysis for possible regulatory actions especially for chemicals in category 2
Further investigation on exposure and risk assessment of allergenic chemicals used in textiles.

A recent letter [3] submitted to EU Commissioners by the Swedish Minister of Environment also highlights a need for more ‘coherent legislation’ and ‘common rules’ to simplify requirements and benefit trade outside the EU (where many European consumer textile products are manufactured) as well as within it to reduce risk and in long-term human health and environmental interests.

The study can be viewed here.

Notes:

[1] The new regulation for labelling was brought in on 27th September 2011, stating that: The labelling and marking of textile products must be "durable, legible, visible and accessible"; Labels must be firmly fixed; Name and percentage in weight of all fibres in the item must be listed in descending order. Fibres that are less than 5% of the total product weight, or together with other fibres are less than 15% of total product weight can be listed as ‘Other fibres’. Textile products made by independent tailors do not need to comply with the labelling regulation.
[2] European Parliament press release 20110510IPR19126
[3] Available to view on the Government Offices of Sweden webpage at: http://www.regeringen.se/content/1/c6/20/17/22/0f714de2.pdf

Approval for Hinkley Point C

20 March 2013

Approval for Hinkley Point C

RPS helps NNB Generation Company secure the first nuclear power station approval in nearly 20 years.

The 3260MW Hinkley Point C nuclear power station in Somerset has just secured development consent from the Government as Energy Secretary Edward Davey has approved the plans prepared for NNB Generation Company – a subsidiary of EDF Energy.

One of the UK’s largest, it is the first nuclear power station to be approved in the UK since 1995, and will be located beside the existing Hinkley Point A and B stations.

The Hinkley Point site was nominated, and accepted on to the Government’s published list of potential sites for the new generation of nuclear power stations in 2009 after consideration by the DECC’s Strategic Siting Assessment.

A number of issues existed around the site, necessitating a particularly detailed and complex application – the largest ever handled by the Planning Inspectorate under the Planning Act 2008. The applications complexities were recognised in a statement regarding the approval made to the House of Commons. It was noted that there was a wide range of mitigational measures and controls particularly to reduce the impact of the construction work on local communities, but that on balance, the benefits of the project outweighed the impacts.

The Decision Letter from the Secretary of State notes the recommendations of the Panel appointed by the IPC to examine the application: “Given our conclusions on the merits of the case for the development proposed…we recommend that an Order granting development consent should be made.”

In approving the application, Mr Davey said “I am confident that the planning decision I have made is robust, evidence-based, compatible with the energy national policy statements and is in the best interests of the country.”

Once completed the two new nuclear reactors comprising the power station will be able to power 5,000,000 UK households and will create 20,000 to 25,000 jobs during construction, with 900 permanent jobs when it is operational.

Deepwater BowTie Ensures Safety Offshore

07 March 2013

Deepwater BowTie Ensures Safety Offshore

RPS develops safety cases with major offshore drilling contractor.

FreeImages.com/ Vee TEC

Since 2007, RPS’ HSE and Risk Management team in Perth, Australia have been working closely with the one of the world’s largest offshore drilling contractors: Ensco Plc, to develop Safety Cases for the ENSCO 7500 and ENSCO 8500-series of mobile offshore drilling units.

The ENSCO 7500 is an ultra-deepwater, dynamically positioned semisubmersible, capable of drilling in water depths up to 7,500’, and has worked for Chevron in Australia and in the US Gulf of Mexico.

The 8500-series are larger, newer units based on the ENSCO 7500 design, and were constructed at the Keppel FELS shipyard in Jurong, Singapore. The seventh, and last of the series (ENSCO 8506) was launched this year, each capable of operating at water depths of up to 8,500’.

The development of Safety Cases allows ENSCO to demonstrate that all risks associated with the operation of these rigs have been reduced to As Low as Reasonably Practicable.

Safety Case development is conducted using a qualitative risk assessment approach (in this case BowTie) which includes and requires extensive participation of the rig crew to meet local regulatory requirements.

Other parts of Safety Cases developed by RPS includes technical risk studies, such as Fire and Explosion Analysis (FEA), Evacuation, Escape and Rescue Analysis (EERA), Emergency Systems Survivability Analysis (ESSA), the description of the Company’s Safety Management System (SMS) and the facility description (FD).